I think that memoirs
and nonfiction need to be 99% true. This is because the genre that they are
publishing it in is telling people before they even read it that it is true. People are expecting a true story and if they
weren’t they would read a different genre. I don’t think the author should use
half-truths just to make the story more interesting. As readers, we are relying
on the author to tell the truth and most the time we don’t really have a way to
verify it is the truth so if authors start telling half-truths, it will hurt
their credibility. Saying this though, I believe that everybody’s opinion on an
event or story will be different so what one person may think is true, another
person who went through the same thing may think otherwise.
I disagree with David
Shields because I think that the genre labels help readers find books they
like. Although many books aren’t just one genre, I think readers acknowledge
that. I think the labels that distinguish between fiction and nonfiction are
important because if we didn’t have these labels, readers would be curious as
to whether or not these things actually happened. The labels help us find the
books we love and naturally gravitate towards rather than having to go through
an entire book store. Even though many authors may not like the fine line
between fiction and nonfiction I think readers like it and appreciate it so we definitely
need these labels.
i disagree with david shields too
ReplyDeleteI agree, If I pick up a book labeled as a ceratin genre I expect it to be what it claims it is.
ReplyDelete